GLOBAL PUSH FOR GENE-EDITED ANIMALS AND PLANTS TO ‘SOLVE’ LOOMING FOOD CRISIS

A new piece of legislation was introduced in the UK Parliament today.

It is called the Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill and is seeking to remove unnecessary barriers to research into new gene editing technology” which the government says were held back by “EU’s rules around gene editing”.

The Bill also aims to ‘rebrand’ the “genetic editing” of plants and animals as distinct from earlier types of GMOs.

The distinction being that gene editing doesn’t introduce DNA from other species, it just ‘speeds up’ what could happen naturally over time – maybe.

Kind of like ‘gain of function’ for food.

All over the world, there is a coordinated push for genetic technology to solve the current food crisis.

Switzerland has amended its moratorium on GMO crops, while Ethiopia says it is growing new genetically edited varieties of wheat and maize.

Even the EU has called for a “rethink” on GMOs, while the Times of Israel asks:

“Can gene editing help farmers satisfy the rising demand for food?”

Scotland’s Press & Journal, meanwhile, has demanded that the “Scottish Government lift its GM ban to ease cost of living crisis”.

I could go on, but you get the idea.

None of it is really about the food crisis.

It is about Climate Change, and the globalists’ obsession with driving humanity into a world of animal free agriculture and lab-made foods.

Apparently, allowing billionaire profiteers like Bill Gates to force bugs and genetically altered food on the world, will “end climate change” and “save the planet”.

That’s why researchers are now churning out report after report saying “Genetic engineering can have a positive effect on the climate”.

And NGOs like “Alliance for Science” proclaiming “GMOs are the key to shrinking Europe’s climate footprint”.

It’s not just crops either.  These people want to gene-edit livestock as well.

In March, the FDA gave the go ahead for gene-edited cattle to be used for food.

As Deutsche Welles put it: “genetically altered “Climate sheep” and “Eco pigs” can help fight global warming too.

Where is it all coming from? I think you know.

It is all brought to you courtesy of the World Economic Forum and the Rockefeller Foundation, whose policy document “Resetting the Table” is the blueprint.

Well, there is a food crisis after all.

Actually, there is an ENGINEERED food crisis.

One that coincidentally allows ‘one worlders’ to roll out another of their pre-planned “solutions” for.

Strange how ‘co-incidences’ only ever seem to work in their favour, not ours.

IEA CALLS FOR CLIMATE LOCKDOWNS

From the beginning, analogies were drawn between Covid and Climate Change which I found alarming.

Green groups and their billionaire funders are known for their strongly autocratic views.  Like all cultists they believe that they know better than anyone else what is best for humanity.

Imagine their joy, therefore, as governments worldwide rolled out a series of tyrannical new laws suspending the democratic process, locking people up in their homes, shutting down businesses, restricting road use and criminalising free speech.

Is it any wonder that those of us who tried to question the ‘reasonableness’ of these laws, were howled down and showered with abuse?

Is it any wonder that so many of them fought the end of lockdowns tooth and nail in 2020?

I mean it wasn’t as if such people actually gave a damn about human health.

No.  It was because they all knew a ‘golden opportunity’ when they saw one.

Right at the outset they understood instantly the precedent that ‘State of Emergency’ laws set when it came to fighting climate change – only their lockdowns would be a lot more permanent of course.

In their eyes, any government with the power to limit private-vehicle use, ration the consumption of meat, impose censorship, close businesses and lock people up, was a government they could really get behind.

Even global governing bodies like the WEF, OECD and IMF, issued broad hints that to achieve ‘net zero’ by 2050, governments may need some form of ‘climate lockdown’ laws.

Now, the International Energy Agency has ‘upped the ante’ by calling for governments worldwide to adopt ‘climate lockdowns’ on the basis that “net zero” won’t be possible unless people are forced to stay home as much as possible.

As the IEA’s “10-Point Plan to Cut Oil Use’ report states:

“Governments have all the necessary tools at their disposal to put oil demand into decline in the coming years, which would support efforts to both strengthen energy security and achieve vital climate goals”.

Proposals include:

“Reducing highway speed limits; more working from home; street changes to encourage walking and cycling; car-free Sundays in cities and restrictions on other days; cutting transit fares; policies that encourage more carpooling; cutting business air travel”.

Suddenly, Queensland’s refusal to lift its Emergency Powers laws last month, makes a lot more sense.