Stephen Andrew statement on democracy descending into despotism

We are witnessing shocking scenes in Melbourne as the “Lucky Country” descends further into despotism. Australians are now watching in horror as their once stable Western democracy disintegrates further into utter chaos and despotism on the streets of Melbourne. Victoria’s heavily militarised and Orwellian-named “Public Order Response Team”, today moved in tight military formation against crowds of protestors, as they fled to the sanctuary of their city’s ancestral Shrine of Remembrance, only to again be chased down by police dogs, shot with rubber bullets and gassed. Crowds that included many elderly Australians and young children.
Across the airwaves, media talking heads, government spokespeople and a host of so-called ‘labor leaders’ swung into gear, working feverishly to ‘quarantine’ and ‘emotionally distance’ the protesting construction workers from the rest of Australia, smearing them as nothing more than “far right extremists” and ‘domestic terrorists’. Clips of the protestors were all carefully edited, framed and editorialised on, in such a way as to create, reinforce and then ram home this narrative in the public mind. The fear being that other Australians, sitting at home, might actually start to feel sympathy, or even worse, make ‘common cause’ with these men, their families and supporters.
How different everything was last year when BLM protestors were rampaging through our streets, defacing public memorials, yelling obscenities and burning Australian flags. Then, our elites were all falling over themselves in the rush to pay fealty and respect to the protestors’ ‘woke’ agenda.
Will anyone ever forget the sight of Victorian police officers kneeling before the screaming, mostly white, hordes, bowing their heads in abject shame and deference. It was like some ritualised act of self-loathing, and a clear sign of our ruling elites’ complete repudiation and contempt for this nation’s history, culture and people. It’s the same ‘repudiation’ and ‘contempt’ we see on their faces today as they all march in lockstep against a group of people they regard as ‘relics’ from the ‘old Australia’ – the Australia they long ago consigned to the dustbin of history.
For all the conservatives out there who have also attacked the protestors, Professor James Allan, summed it up best when he wrote in yesterday’s Spectator:
“..there is nothing in being a conservative that precludes one from thinking that a situation is so bad – because the lawful authorities have gone so far off the rails – that protest and disobedience of the law is fully warranted.”
“Think about this from the point of view of elected politicians who have become way too big for their elected boots, and started to exhibit some of the traits of the despotic, heavy-handed petty tyrant. A citizenry full of those who refuse to practice civil disobedience (or make out that a citizenry of conservatives who think their primary allegiance must always and everywhere be solely to the law and to whatever those with the lawful authority to make legal rules say) is a society that takes the same path … as ‘sheep to the slaughterhouse’.”

Stephen Andrew statement on jabs for kids

I have received numerous calls and messages from parents over the past few weeks, concerned by the Queensland Government’s evident rush to get ‘jabs’ into the arms of their vulnerable children before all proper safety trials on the new technology have been completed.
The Queensland Premier and Health Minister have said recently they want every child from year 6 and above fully or partially vaccinated against Covid before they will consider re-opening the State. The speed with which they are moving ahead with these plans is alarming, especially given so many infectious disease experts, here and overseas, are recommending caution on the roll-out of these injections to children. Many are advising we wait, at least until Phase III trials of the vaccine are all completed and more research has been done on any long-term effects this new mRNA technology could have on children’s still developing bodies.
Professor Robert Booy, who is the Professor of Paediatrics and Child Health at the University of Sydney and also head of Clinical Research at the National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance, says that governments shouldn’t be rushing to vaccinate healthy children. “We shouldn’t be rushing something that for children is not a severe illness” he told the Herald Sun earlier this month. Martin Makary, a Professor at the John Hopkins School of Medicine wrote in the Wall Street Journal in July that the evidence behind the vaccination push for children was ‘flimsy’ at best. His team analysed about 48,000 cases of children under 18 diagnosed with Covid-19. “Our report found a mortality rate of zero among children without a pre-existing medical condition such as leukaemia”. The findings, he said, had “significant implications for healthy kids and whether they need two vaccine doses”.
Earlier this month the UK’s vaccine advisory body, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation told the UK government there was still “insufficient evidence” on the long-term effect of these mRNA technologies on young, still developing bodies. The Committee said that given children were at such a low risk from the virus, any roll-out of ‘jabs’ would provide only “marginal gain”. The Committee’s advice was that it did NOT recommend vaccinating “healthy children” in the UK.
The Committee has previously complained about “the habit of government health officials sitting in on their meetings” and interfering in the decision-making process. So far the Committee has stood firm, with the Chairman saying recently that governments should be “taking a precautionary approach”: “The margin of benefit” he said, “is considered too small to support universal Covid-19 vaccination in this age group at this time.”
Clearly, there is sufficient doubt amongst experts as to the long-term effects of these vaccines, to justify excluding children from any government vaccination roll-out targets. If ever a situation called for adopting a ‘precautionary principle’ policy, surely this is it!
MUMS & DADS. Thoughts please?