, ,

Making lies work

HAVE AUTHORITIES MASSIVELY UNDERESTIMATED THE NUMBER OF “UNVACCINATED”?

According to Britain’s Office of National Statistics (ONS), the official unvaccinated rate is 8 percent, a very low number.

Whether this number is accurate, however, is becoming increasingly open to question in the UK.

It started with the release of the latest UK Health Security Agency Report in July.

As one critic tweeted at the time: “the report reveals that almost 30 percent of those eligible in the UK, have not had a single dose of the vaccine.  Even if you take out those aged under 18, you still have 20 percent without a single dose.”

Now a controversial BBC2 documentary called “Unvaccinated”, hosted by mathematician Hannah Fry, is raising more eyebrows.

In the documentary, Fry refers to the fact that the BBC had commissioned the largest UK-wide representative survey, since the vaccine rollout began, for the program.

The BBC survey included 2570 people, of whom 664 said they had never been vaccinated – that’s 26 PERCENT!

The anomaly was picked up by Norman Fenton, Professor of Risk Information Management at Queen Mary London University and a Research Fellow of The Alan Turing Institute, who said that with such a large and representative survey sample: “it would be virtually impossible, by any kind of statistical analysis, for the true proportion of unvaccinated to be anything less than 20 percent”.

Fenton downloaded the survey data and examined it in detail against the “nationally representative profile” based on ONS census data.

He found that it all matched pretty closely and was therefore stunned to find the company had made a big ‘weighting’ adjustment to the “net unvaccinated” figure.

“This reduced those 664 responses to just 216” he said.

“Which is completely insane.  It doesn’t make any sense whatsoever”.

“When you scroll back, you can see that all the counts are adjusted based on that weighted difference, changing the percentage from 26 to 8 percent.”

“It’s pretty safe to conclude that the ONS claim of 8 percent massively underestimates the actual number, and the true rate is probably at least 20 percent” he said.

Why does it matter?

It matters because all of the “safety and efficacy” studies were carried out on the presumption that the official ONS figure was accurate.

If ONS has massively overestimated the “vaccinated” rate, he said, then all those “safety and efficacy” studies were done on flawed data.

It would also mean that the “fatality rate” for the “unvaccinated” compared to “vaccinated”, has also been massively overestimated.

/0 Comments/by

Speech from Hell

RISE OF ‘DARK BIDEN’

President Biden’s speech at Independence Hall in Philadelphia last Thursday was a remarkable piece of political stagecraft and theatre.

The reaction from the public ranged from total disgust on one hand and merciless ridicule and mocking on the other.

There is no doubt the ‘optics’ were a disaster.

As one online critic tweeted:

“Who gives a speech warning people about how dangerous Republicans are to democracy, while having a background that looks like the Soviet Union and Hitler had a baby”.

Even more frightening than the imagery, however, was the language.

Biden’s words were shockingly inflammatory, divisive and dangerous.

Never before has an American president singled out a particular group domestically and demonised them as ‘enemies of democracy’ who “must be defeated”.

This emphasis on democracy and the ‘threat to democracy’ which is clearly a perversion, was used throughout the speech.

The premise being that there is some form of underground subversive network conspiring to overthrow the ‘rule of law’ and ‘destroy democracy’.

It is a premise being used worldwide to justify the loss of even more freedoms and rights than we lost as part of the West’s ‘war on terror’.

For now, the ‘enemy du jour’ are ‘MAGA patriots’ but that can easily change.

It is significant that Biden never actually defines what a MAGA or an ‘extremist’ is exactly?

The word ‘Democracy’, meanwhile, has a similarly ambiguous meaning.

It appears to have been redefined to mean anything opposed to ‘the Consensus’ view of those in power.

The idea being that the ‘Consensus’ equates to the ‘majority’ – although this has never been tested in any nation-wide polls.  That would be far too risky.

Everything about Biden’s speech was staged for emotional, subliminal impact.  It was highly scripted with carefully chosen buzzwords, or dog whistles.

These are a way of calling out all those who oppose your agenda, labelling them as ‘enemies’ and marking them out for destruction.

This is how totalitarian societies have rid themselves of political dissidents throughout history.

Identify them, label them, demonise and then destroy them.

From Nero to Pol Pot, Mao, Hitler and Stalin – the tactic is always the same.

Of course, we all know there is no way that Biden wrote that speech.

He is just a willing mouthpiece for those who pull his strings.

It is they who hate and despise everything the so-called MAGA enemy stands for – small government, freedom, individual autonomy, civil rights and national sovereignty.

Biden may have been the one delivering the speech, but the words and messaging were theirs.

It is a message that Australians need to pay attention to, because the same process is happening here.

/0 Comments/by